All Courses
All Courses
OBJECTIVE: For this challenge, we have created two versions of the mixing tee. One of them is longer than the other. Our job is to set up steady-state simulations to compare the mixing effectiveness when hot inlet temperature is 360C & the Cold inlet is at 190C. Use the k-epsilon and k-omega SST model for the…
Sachin Barse
updated on 07 Nov 2022
OBJECTIVE:
For this challenge, we have created two versions of the mixing tee. One of them is longer than the other.
Our job is to set up steady-state simulations to compare the mixing effectiveness when hot inlet temperature is 360C & the Cold inlet is at 190C.
Use the k-epsilon and k-omega SST model for the first case and based on your judgment use the more suitable model for further cases. Giving the reason for choosing a suitable model is compulsory.
INTRODUCTION:
The function of mixing Tee is to provide proper mixing of quantities to get the desired result at the outlet.
By controlling the velocity of chilled air we can get the desired temperature in the room.
ANSYS WORKFLOW:
GEOMETRY: Construct a two or three dimensional representation of the object to be modelled and tested using the work plane coordinate system within ANSYS.
MESH: At this point ANSYS understands the makeup of the part. Now define how the modelled system should be broken down into finite pieces.
SETUP: The case setup will be done using ansys fluent
SOLUTION: Ansys fluent where run time result visualization is done
RESULTS: Post processing of results will be done here using CFD-post
SHORT TEE:
GEOMETRY SETUP:
The computational models are uploaded to the Ansys Space Claim as a step file.
In this project, we are interested in performing fluid flow analysis through the geometry, hence we used the volume extraction option to extract the fluid volume from the geometry. Then the solid model is suppressed for physics from the fluid model to create mesh at the interested region.
MESH GENERATION:
The boundary names inlet_x, inlet_y, outlet and wall are defined using the named selection option.
After generating the mesh, the number of nodes and elements are investigated using the statistics option. Then the mesh quality is checked by choosing the mesh metrices option in quality section.
The element quality should not be less than 5%. In our case minimum mesh quality is 30%, so we can move ahead.
SETUP AND SOLUTION:
CASE 1:
CASE 1.1:
SETUPS |
SHORT TEE (MR=2 AND HOT INLET VELOCITY = 3m/s)
|
|
K-EPSILON |
K-OMEGA |
|
SOLVER TYPE |
Pressure based |
Pressure based |
VELOCITY FORMULATION |
Absolute |
Absolute |
TIME |
Steady |
Steady |
VISCOUS MODEL |
Realizable K-epsilon with standard wall function |
K-omega SST model |
MATERIAL |
Air |
Air |
CELL ZONES |
Fluid type : air |
Fluid type : air |
BOUNDARIES |
· Inlet_x (velocity inlet) Velocity magnitude 3m/s Temperature - 360c · Inlet_y (velocity inlet) Velocity magnitude 6m/s Temperature – 190c · Outlet (pressure outlet) Gauge pressure – 0 pa · Walls – stationary walls |
· Inlet_x (velocity inlet) Velocity magnitude 3m/s Temperature - 360c · Inlet_y (velocity inlet) Velocity magnitude 6m/s Temperature – 190c · Outlet (pressure outlet) Gauge pressure – 0 pa · Walls – stationary walls |
The hybrid scheme is used for initialization and the no. of iterations are setup and then click on calculate option.
RESULTS:
K-EPSILON MODEL:
RESIDUAL PLOT:
AREA WEIGHTED AVERAGE:
STANDARD DEVIATION:
CONTOUR PLOT:
TEMPERATURE CONTOUR:
VELOCITY CONTOUR:
STREAMLINE PLOT:
TEMPERATURE:
VELOCITY:
K-OMEGA MODEL:
RESIDUAL PLOT:
AREA WEIGHTED AVERAGE:
STANDARD DEVIATION:
CONTOUR PLOT:
TEMPERATURE CONTOUR:
VELOCITY CONTOUR:
STREAMLINE PLOT:
TEMPERATURE:
VELOCITY:
SUMMARY:
|
SHORT TEE (MR = 2) |
|
K-EPSILON |
K-OMEGA |
|
AVERAGE OUTLET TEMPERATURE [K] |
303.413 |
303.458 |
STANDARD DEVIATION |
1.5 |
1.6 |
NO OF ITERATIONS |
150 |
170 |
CASE 1.2:
SETUPS |
SHORT TEE (MR=2 AND HOT INLET VELOCITY = 3m/s)
|
|
K-EPSILON |
K-OMEGA |
|
SOLVER TYPE |
Pressure based |
Pressure based |
VELOCITY FORMULATION |
Absolute |
Absolute |
TIME |
Steady |
Steady |
VISCOUS MODEL |
Realizable K-epsilon with standard wall function |
K-omega SST model |
MATERIAL |
Air |
Air |
CELL ZONES |
Fluid type : air |
Fluid type : air |
BOUNDARIES |
· Inlet_x (velocity inlet) Velocity magnitude 3m/s Temperature - 360c · Inlet_y (velocity inlet) Velocity magnitude 12m/s Temperature – 190c · Outlet (pressure outlet) Gauge pressure – 0 pa · Walls – stationary walls |
· Inlet_x (velocity inlet) Velocity magnitude 3m/s Temperature - 360c · Inlet_y (velocity inlet) Velocity magnitude 12m/s Temperature – 190c · Outlet (pressure outlet) Gauge pressure – 0 pa · Walls – stationary walls |
The hybrid scheme is used for initialization and the no. of iterations are setup and then click on calculate option.
RESULTS:
K-EPSILON MODEL:
RESIDUAL PLOT:
AREA WEIGHTED AVERAGE:
STANDARD DEVIATION:
CONTOUR PLOT:
TEMPERATURE CONTOUR:
VELOCITY CONTOUR:
STREAMLINE PLOT:
TEMPERATURE:
VELOCITY:
K-OMEGA MODEL:
RESIDUAL PLOT:
AREA WEIGHTED AVERAGE:
STANDARD DEVIATION:
CONTOUR PLOT:
TEMPERATURE CONTOUR:
VELOCITY CONTOUR:
STREAMLINE PLOT:
TEMPERATURE:
VELOCITY:
SUMMARY:
|
SHORT TEE (MR = 4) |
|
K-EPSILON |
K-OMEGA |
|
AVERAGE OUTLET TEMPERATURE [K] |
300.396 |
300.38 |
STANDARD DEVIATION |
1.1 |
1.2 |
NO OF ITERATIONS |
130 |
160 |
ANALYTICAL SOLUTION:
MOMENTUM RATIO 2:
MOMENTUM RATIO 4:
CONCLUSION:
AVERAGE OUTLET TEMPERATURE:
On comparing the both models with analytical solution we got nearly the same results.
ITERATIONS TO CONVERGE:
No. of iterations taken to converge is less for Realisable K-epsilon model than K-omega SST model.
STANDARD DEVIATION:
The standard deviation of k-epsilon model is less than k-omega model which shows the better mixing efficiency in k-epsilon model.
So based on the above observations the K-epsilon turbulence model is predicting the results accurately in less no. of iterations. So we can use realisable k-epsilon model for case 2
LONG TEE:
GEOMETRY SETUP:
The computational models are uploaded to the Ansys Space Claim as a step file.
In this project, we are interested in performing fluid flow analysis through the geometry, hence we used the volume extraction option to extract the fluid volume from the geometry. Then the solid model is suppressed for physics from the fluid model to create mesh at the interested region.
MESH GENERATION:
The boundary names inlet_x, inlet_y, outlet and wall are defined using the named selection option.
After generating the mesh, the number of nodes and elements are investigated using the statistics option. Then the mesh quality is checked by choosing the mesh metrices option in quality section.
The element quality should not be less than 5%. In our case minimum mesh quality is 30%, so we can move ahead.
SETUP AND SOLUTION:
CASE 2:
CASE 2.1:
SETUPS |
LONG TEE (MR=2 AND HOT INLET VELOCITY 3m/s) |
K-EPSILON |
|
SOLVER TYPE |
Pressure based |
VELOCITY FORMULATION |
Absolute |
TIME |
Steady |
VISCOUS MODEL |
Realizable K-epsilon with standard wall function |
MATERIAL |
Air |
CELL ZONES |
Fluid type : air |
BOUNDARIES |
· Inlet_x (velocity inlet) Velocity magnitude 3m/s Temperature - 360c · Inlet_y (velocity inlet) Velocity magnitude 6m/s Temperature – 190c · Outlet (pressure outlet) Gauge pressure – 0 pa · Walls – stationary walls |
The hybrid scheme is used for initialization and the no. of iterations are setup and then click on calculate option.
RESULTS:
RESIDUAL PLOT:
AREA WEIGHTED AVERAGE:
STANDARD DEVIATION:
CONTOUR PLOT:
TEMPERATURE CONTOUR:
VELOCITY CONTOUR:
STREAMLINE PLOT:
TEMPERATURE:
VELOCITY:
CASE 2.2:
SETUPS |
LONG TEE (MR=2 AND HOT INLET VELOCITY 3m/s) |
K-EPSILON |
|
SOLVER TYPE |
Pressure based |
VELOCITY FORMULATION |
Absolute |
TIME |
Steady |
VISCOUS MODEL |
Realizable K-epsilon with standard wall function |
MATERIAL |
Air |
CELL ZONES |
Fluid type : air |
BOUNDARIES |
· Inlet_x (velocity inlet) Velocity magnitude 3m/s Temperature - 360c · Inlet_y (velocity inlet) Velocity magnitude 12m/s Temperature – 190c · Outlet (pressure outlet) Gauge pressure – 0 pa · Walls – stationary walls |
The hybrid scheme is used for initialization and the no. of iterations are setup and then click on calculate option.
RESULTS:
RESIDUAL PLOT:
AREA WEIGHTED AVERAGE:
STANDARD DEVIATION:
CONTOUR PLOT:
TEMPERATURE CONTOUR:
VELOCITY CONTOUR:
STREAMLINE PLOT:
TEMPERATURE:
VELOCITY:
SUMMARY:
|
LONG TEE (MR = 2) |
LONG TEE (MR = 4) |
AVERAGE OUTLET TEMPERATURE [K] |
303.367 |
300.449 |
STANDARD DEVIATION |
1.2 |
0.8 |
NO OF ITERATIONS |
180 |
130 |
COMPARISON OF BOTH LONG AND SHORT TEE:
K-EPSILON REALIZABLE MODEL |
|||||
GEOMETRY |
MOMENTUM RATIO |
CELL COUNT |
AVERAGE OUTLET TEMPERATURE [K] |
NO. OF ITERATIONS |
STANDARD DEVIATION |
SHORT TEE |
2 |
12583 |
303.413 |
150 |
1.5 |
SHORT TEE |
4 |
12583 |
300.396 |
130 |
1.1 |
LONG TEE |
2 |
15368 |
303.367 |
180 |
1.2 |
LONG TEE |
4 |
15368 |
300.449 |
130 |
0.8 |
OVERALL DISCUSSION:
AVERAGE OUTLET TEMPERATURE:
Irrespective of length of the mixing Tee, the average outlet temperature on both cases are quite same.
MOMENTUM RATIO:
NO. OF ITERATIONS:
The longer Tee takes more time to converge than short Tee.
CONCLUSION:
GRID INDEPENDENCY TEST:
Short Tee model is selected for grid dependence test.
MESH GENERATION:
5mm:
4mm:
3mm:
RESULTS:
5mm:
RESIDUAL PLOT:
AREA WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF TEMPERATURE:
STANDARD DEVIATION OF TEMPERATURE:
4mm:
RESIDUAL PLOT:
AREA WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF TEMPERATURE:
STANDARD DEVIATION OF TEMPERATURE:
3mm:
RESIDUAL PLOT:
AREA WEIGHTED AVERAGE OF TEMPERATURE:
STANDARD DEVIATION OF TEMPERATURE:
SUMMARY:
MESH SIZE |
NO. OF ELEMENTS |
NO. OF NODES |
AVERAGE OUTLET TEMPERATURE |
NO. OF ITERATIONS |
5mm |
16143 |
3460 |
303.251 |
250 |
4mm |
23007 |
4925 |
303.246 |
175 |
3mm |
39921 |
8369 |
303.292 |
210 |
CONCLUSION:
Leave a comment
Thanks for choosing to leave a comment. Please keep in mind that all the comments are moderated as per our comment policy, and your email will not be published for privacy reasons. Please leave a personal & meaningful conversation.
Other comments...
Fender Design - Wheel Arch Challenge
AIM:- Calculate the Wheel Arch gap at required points and check whether the car passes the European standard. WHEEL ARCH: The wheel arch is the semicircular part positioned above the wheel of a vehicle. The most important body change was that the front wheel arch was cut higher into the fender. Corrosion…
11 Feb 2023 07:01 PM IST
Section Modulus calculation and optimization
Aim To calculate section modulus of hood and optimize the design to have improved section modulus. Section modulus:- Section modulus is a direct measure of a strength of any cross sectional area of an object about an reference axis. The formula of section modulus is given by, S=I / Y Where,I = Moment of inertia (mm^4)Y…
11 Feb 2023 06:16 PM IST
Week 5 Challenge : Surface wrap on Automotive Assembly
Aim/Objective : To do surface wrap over assembled parts (engine,transmission and gear box) Target length for Wrap = 3mm Procedure : First the model is loaded on to ANSA Unwanted surface are deleted without damaging the outer shape of the geometries. Single cons are resolved mainly here as it would affect negetively on…
25 Jan 2023 01:56 AM IST
Week 4 Challenge : CFD Meshing for BMW car
Aim: CFD meshing in BMW car Procedure: To perform CFD meshing in BMW car by following steps: 1) Clear the geometrical errors/topo clean up 2)Assign PIDs 3)Surface meshing 4) Create Wind tunnel 5) Volumetric meshing Steps - Resolving Geometrical Errors - Import the Geometry. You are in the "Topo Deck" by default.…
20 Jan 2023 07:44 PM IST
Related Courses